Mazda CX-30 in Soul Red Crystal Metallic
For drivers seeking a compact crossover that combines style, agility, and efficiency, the Mazda CX-30 stands out as a compelling choice. When comparing the Mazda CX-30 versus the CX-5, enthusiasts often focus on aspects like handling, responsiveness, and the overall driving experience. Both models deliver impressive handling characteristics and a fun-to-drive nature, yet they differ significantly in interior space and cargo capacity, reflecting their respective classifications as subcompact and compact SUVs.
While both vehicles share numerous interior features, technological amenities, and safety systems, their size difference is a key factor influencing purchasing decisions. Here, we explore how the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 compare in terms of dimensions, focusing on exterior measurements, interior space, and cargo capacity. Let’s begin by examining their exterior sizes and how these translate into interior comfort and usability.
Exterior Dimensions: How Do the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 Differ in Size?
The Mazda CX-5 and CX-30 are both praised for their nimbleness, thanks to their relatively small footprints. They are designed to offer a balance between compactness for city driving and sufficient space for passenger comfort and cargo. The CX-30, positioned as a subcompact SUV, fills the niche left by the discontinued Mazda CX-3, providing a versatile entry point into Mazda’s SUV lineup.
Measuring approximately 173 inches in length with a wheelbase of 104.4 inches, the Mazda CX-30 is notably shorter than the Mazda CX-5, which measures about 180.1 inches long with a 106.2-inch wheelbase. Width-wise, the CX-5 is roughly two inches wider, at 72.6 inches compared to the CX-30’s 70.7 inches. Height differences are also notable, with the CX-30 standing at just 61.7 inches tall—especially with 16-inch wheels—while the CX-5 reaches approximately 66.1 inches in height, providing a more commanding presence.
Ground clearance is a factor that enhances off-road and rough-road capability. The CX-30 boasts a ground clearance of about 8 inches, slightly higher than the CX-5’s 7.6 to 7.9 inches, thanks to its lower overall height and design focus on agility and urban driving.
Interior Space and Passenger Comfort: Comparing the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5
The interior dimensions reflect the exterior size differences prominently. The Mazda CX-5 offers a more spacious environment, with a passenger volume of approximately 103.6 cubic feet, compared to the CX-30’s 94.1 cubic feet. This nearly 10-cubic-foot difference translates into more comfortable seating, especially for rear passengers.
In terms of headroom, both models provide ample space: the CX-30 offers 38.1 inches in the front and 38.3 inches in the rear, while the CX-5 provides slightly more at 39.7 inches in front and 39 inches in the rear. Legroom in the front is similar, but second-row legroom is notably greater in the CX-5, with 39.6 inches versus the CX-30’s 36.3 inches, enhancing comfort on longer journeys.
Cargo Capacity: The Practical Difference Between the Two SUVs
Cargo space is a critical consideration for many buyers. The Mazda CX-5 stands out with a capacity of up to 29.1 cubic feet behind the second row, and when seats are folded, the maximum cargo space expands to approximately 59.3 cubic feet. The CX-30, being smaller, offers about 20.2 cubic feet behind the rear seats, with a maximum of around 45.2 cubic feet when folded.
The design of the rear seats also influences usability. The CX-30 features a straightforward 60/40 split-folding rear seat, while the CX-5 offers a more flexible 40/20/40 split, allowing for more versatile cargo and seating configurations.
Key Specifications at a Glance: The Numbers Behind the Models
| 2024 Mazda CX-30 | 2024 Mazda CX-5 | |
| Length (in.) | 173 | 180.1 |
| Wheelbase (in.) | 104.4 | 106.2 |
| Width (in.) | 70.7 | 72.6 |
| Height (in.) | 61.7 | 66.1 |
| Turning Diameter (ft.) | 34.8 | 36 |
| Engine | 2.5L I-4 | 2.5L I-4 |
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| EPA City MPG | 26 | 26 |
| EPA Highway MPG | 33 | 31 |
| Passenger Volume (cu. ft.) | 94.1 | 103.6 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Cargo Space (cu. ft.) | 20.2 | 29.1 |
| Max Cargo Capacity (cu. ft.) | 45.2 | 59.3 |
| Second-row Head Room (in.) | 38.3 | 39 |
| Second-row Leg Room (in.) | 36.3 | 39.6 |
Engine Performance and Fuel Efficiency: Comparing Power and Economy
Both the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 are equipped with similar powertrains, sharing the same base engine—a 2.5-liter inline-four that produces 191 horsepower (CX-30) and 187 horsepower (CX-5). Each offers 186 pound-feet of torque and standard all-wheel drive in the 2024 models.
Turbocharged options are available in both, delivering up to 320 pound-feet of torque when running premium fuel, making these trims significantly more powerful. The lighter weight of the CX-30 gives it a slight edge in acceleration, with 0-60 mph times of approximately 8.1 seconds for the CX-30 versus 8.3 seconds for the CX-5 in non-turbo versions. Turbo trims are even quicker, with times around 5.8 seconds for the CX-30 and 6.2 seconds for the CX-5.
Fuel economy ratings favor the CX-30 somewhat, especially on the highway, where it achieves up to 33 MPG compared to the CX-5’s 31 MPG. Both models perform well in city driving, with about 26 MPG. These efficiency figures can vary depending on engine technology, such as cylinder deactivation, which enhances the CX-5’s highway economy in certain trims.
Pricing and Value Proposition: Which Model Offers More for Your Money?
The starting price point for the Mazda CX-30 is approximately $24,995, making it a more affordable option for budget-conscious buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 begins at around $29,300, reflecting its larger size and additional interior space. Despite the price difference, both vehicles provide comparable levels of technology, safety features, and performance, with the main distinction being size and cargo capacity.
For those prioritizing spaciousness and cargo, the CX-5 offers greater versatility. However, if affordability, maneuverability, and efficiency are your top priorities, the CX-30 presents an excellent value. Used models can further reduce the price gap, making the CX-5 potentially the better deal in the pre-owned market, especially if interior space is a key factor.
Concluding Insights: Which Mazda SUV Is Right for You?
In the ultimate comparison, the Mazda CX-5 emerges as the more practical choice for most drivers due to its larger interior, increased cargo capacity, and overall versatility. Its sporty handling and balanced performance make it suitable for a variety of driving needs, from daily commuting to weekend adventures. The extra space and comfort can significantly enhance long-distance travel experiences.
Nevertheless, the Mazda CX-30 remains a compelling alternative for urban dwellers and those seeking a more agile, fuel-efficient vehicle that still offers impressive features and style. Its lower weight translates into better acceleration and fuel economy, while its compact size makes parking and city navigation easier.
Stay Updated with Our Newsletter
Never miss out on the latest Mazda news, updates, and reviews—subscribe to our newsletter today.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the primary differences between the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5?
The fundamental distinctions lie in their size and interior space. The CX-5 is larger, offering more cargo capacity (up to 59.3 cubic feet) and passenger comfort, while the CX-30 is smaller, more maneuverable, and slightly more fuel-efficient. Both models share similar performance credentials, but their size influences their practicality and price.
Is the Mazda CX-5 notably bigger than the CX-30?
Yes, the Mazda CX-5 is significantly larger, measuring about 180.1 inches in length and providing a passenger volume of roughly 103.6 cubic feet. The CX-30 is around 173 inches long with a passenger volume of about 94.1 cubic feet, making the CX-5 the more spacious choice.
Does the size of the Mazda CX-30 make it too small for practical use?
While the CX-30 is similar in size to a compact car like the Mazda3 Hatchback and is considered a subcompact SUV, it offers sufficient interior space for daily commuting and light cargo needs. For larger families or those requiring more cargo capacity, stepping up to the CX-5 is advisable.
Between the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5, which model is generally better?
Choosing the better model depends on individual priorities. The CX-5 offers more interior space and cargo versatility, making it suitable for family use and long trips. The CX-30 excels in agility, efficiency, and affordability, appealing to urban drivers and those valuing a sporty, compact SUV.
How do the pricing structures compare between the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5?
The Mazda CX-30 starts at approximately $24,995, whereas the CX-5 begins at around $29,300. The price difference primarily reflects the larger size and additional interior space of the CX-5, although both vehicles share many features and options.