Detailed Insights into Mazda’s Small Crossover SUVs: CX-30 & CX-50
If you’re considering a new Mazda small crossover SUV that offers a blend of agility, efficiency, and style, the options likely come down to the Mazda CX-30 and CX-50. Both models appeal to drivers looking for a versatile and sporty vehicle, but their differences in size, features, and pricing can influence your choice. Understanding their unique strengths and limitations will help you decide which one best fits your lifestyle and driving preferences.
Quick Summary: Pros & Cons at a Glance
Mazda CX-30
Advantages:
- Exceptional fuel economy with a lighter, more nimble build that enhances driving enjoyment and efficiency.
- More budget-friendly, making it an attractive entry-level choice within Mazda’s SUV lineup.
- Ample ground clearance combined with a comfortable ride height facilitates easy entry and exit, ideal for urban and suburban settings.
- Perfect for those transitioning from compact cars who want a small SUV without the bulk of larger models.
Disadvantages:
- Limited cargo space and interior versatility compared to larger SUVs, similar to the dimensions of its base Mazda3 platform.
- The extensive use of rugged black plastic cladding around the wheels and lower body may not appeal to all aesthetic preferences.
Mazda CX-50
Advantages:
- Superior towing capacity, capable of hauling up to 3,500 pounds—significantly more than the CX-30’s 1,500 pounds.
- Available off-road features, including specialized Off-Road mode and the rugged Meridian Edition, designed for adventurous driving.
- Increased second-row legroom and larger cargo capacity make it more practical for families and outdoor gear.
- Enhanced ground clearance maintains a sleek profile while providing better capability on rough terrains.
Disadvantages:
- Wider stance and bulkier exterior dimensions do not necessarily translate into more interior shoulder or hip room compared to the smaller CX-30.
- Higher price point reflects its more substantial size and feature set, making it a more significant investment.
Size & Space: Comparing Dimensions and Interior Comfort
The size disparity between the Mazda CX-30 and CX-50 is notable. The CX-50 extends approximately one foot longer and five inches wider, with a wheelbase that is six inches longer, contributing to a more substantial presence on the road. The interior passenger volume of the CX-50 measures around 100.3 cubic feet, surpassing the CX-30’s 94.1 cubic feet. Despite these differences, both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers, with ample cabin space tailored for everyday comfort.
The shorter wheelbase and overall length of the CX-30 impact its second-row legroom and cargo capacity, but it still offers impressive utility relative to its size. Interestingly, the narrower width and lower height of the CX-30 do not compromise headroom and shoulder space, which remain comparable to the larger CX-50. This makes the smaller SUV surprisingly spacious inside, despite its compact exterior.
| Mazda CX-30 | Mazda CX-50 | |
| Length | 173 in | 185.8 in |
| Width | 70.7 in | 75.6 in |
| Height | 61.7 in | 63.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 104.4 in | 110.8 in |
| Passenger Volume | 94.1 cu ft | 100.3 cu ft |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Headroom | 1st Row: 38.1 in 2nd Row: 38.3 in |
1st Row: 39.1 in 2nd Row: 38.6 in |
| Legroom | 1st Row: 41.7 in 2nd Row: 36.3 in |
1st Row: 41.7 in 2nd Row: 39.8 in |
| Shoulder Room | 1st Row: 55.6 in 2nd Row: 53.6 in |
1st Row: 55.9 in 2nd Row: 53.6 in |
| Hip Room | 1st Row: 54.6 in 2nd Row: 53.2 in |
1st Row: 53.6 in 2nd Row: 52.1 in |
| Cargo Space | 20.2 cu ft | 31.4 cu ft |
| Max Cargo Capacity | 45.2 cu ft | 56.3 cu ft |
Performance & Fuel Economy: Powertrain Choices & Efficiency
Both the Mazda CX-30 and CX-50 are powered by Mazda’s renowned Skyactiv-G 2.5-liter engines, with turbocharged variants offering additional power. The naturally aspirated 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine in the CX-30 produces up to 191 horsepower, while the CX-50’s engine delivers slightly less at 187 horsepower. However, the turbocharged versions tell a different story: the CX-50 Turbo reaches up to 256 horsepower, edging out the CX-30 Turbo’s 250 horsepower, provided both use premium fuel.
Fuel efficiency remains competitive between the two. The CX-30’s base engine achieves an impressive EPA estimate of 26/33 MPG (City/Highway), making it an excellent choice for budget-conscious drivers. The CX-50’s base engine offers a slightly lower rating at 24/30 MPG, but opting for the hybrid model can enhance its efficiency significantly. When comparing turbocharged models, the fuel economy difference narrows, with the larger CX-50 Turbo only dropping one MPG behind the CX-30 Turbo in both city and highway driving, making the larger vehicle still quite economical considering its size and power capabilities.
For towing needs, the CX-50 is the clear winner, capable of hauling up to 3,500 pounds, compared to the CX-30’s modest 1,500-pound capacity. Both models come with standard all-wheel drive and a six-speed automatic transmission with sport mode, enhancing their versatility and driving enjoyment.
| Mazda CX-30 | Mazda CX-50 | |
| Horsepower | 191 | 187 |
| Turbo Model Horsepower | Up to 250 | Up to 256 |
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| EPA-Est. MPG City | 26 | 24 |
| EPA-Est. MPG Highway | 33 | 30 |
| Turbo Model MPG City | 22 | 23 |
| Turbo Model MPG Highway | 30 | 29 |
| 0-60 mph (Turbo Model) | 5.8 sec | 6.4 sec |
Having explored the key distinctions in size, interior space, power, and fuel efficiency, you can now better determine which Mazda SUV aligns with your driving needs and lifestyle. If the larger dimensions and increased utility of the CX-50 appeal to you, consider how it compares with the Mazda CX-5 or the upcoming CX-70 for larger or more rugged options. Conversely, if affordability and compact urban maneuverability are priorities, the CX-30 remains an excellent choice. Remember, both models can be similarly equipped, and choosing between them often comes down to your specific space and performance preferences.
Additional Resources & Comparisons
If you’re contemplating an upgrade or simply exploring the Mazda SUV family, we’ve also prepared detailed comparisons between the CX-30 and Mazda’s popular CX-5, as well as the new CX-70, to help you make an informed decision. Keep in mind that the CX-30 generally offers a more affordable entry point, even when both models are similarly equipped, making it a compelling choice for budget-conscious buyers seeking quality and style.
Join Our Newsletter
Stay updated with the latest Mazda news, reviews, and offers by subscribing to our newsletter. Never miss out on new releases or special deals by signing up today!