Mazda CX-50 Hybrid: A New Benchmark in Compact Hybrid SUVs
The segment of compact hybrid SUVs is experiencing a significant evolution with the introduction of the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid alongside Subaru’s latest offerings—the Forester Hybrid and Crosstrek Hybrid models. Coming hot off the heels of the CX-50 Hybrid’s debut, Subaru has announced its new hybrid variants for the 2025 and 2026 model years, aiming to compete fiercely in this growing market niche.
Much like their gas-powered counterparts, the Subaru Forester Hybrid and Crosstrek Hybrid are built on platforms heavily derived from their traditional models, which allows for straightforward comparisons of their dimensions, features, and capabilities. While we await the opportunity to conduct comprehensive drive tests of all three vehicles in a comparative setting, this overview provides detailed insights into how these hybrid SUVs stack up in key aspects including power, efficiency, ground clearance, passenger comfort, and cargo capacity.
Summary Comparison: Mazda CX-50 Hybrid versus Subaru Forester and Crosstrek Hybrids
- Power Output: The Mazda CX-50 Hybrid delivers an impressive 219 horsepower, outpacing the Subaru Forester and Crosstrek hybrids, which produce 194 horsepower each.
- Fuel Efficiency: The CX-50 Hybrid leads in fuel economy with an estimated EPA combined rating of up to 38 MPG, whereas the Subaru models achieve approximately 35 MPG combined.
- Cargo Capacity: When all seats are upright, the Mazda offers a generous 29.2 cubic feet of cargo space, but the Subaru Forester Hybrid excels with a maximum of 69.1 cubic feet when rear seats are folded down.
- Ground Clearance: Both Subaru hybrids provide a higher ground clearance at 8.7 inches, compared to the CX-50 Hybrid’s 8.1 inches, enhancing off-road capability.
Exploring Powertrains: Mazda CX-50 Hybrid Versus Subaru Hybrids
The Mazda CX-50 Hybrid adopts a powertrain similar to the Toyota hybrid system, sharing the same 2.5-liter inline-four gasoline engine paired with three electric motors, creating a robust hybrid setup. This electric all-wheel-drive (e-AWD) system comes standard, with the petrol engine powering the front wheels and an electric motor driving the rear wheels, providing seamless all-terrain performance.
In contrast, Subaru’s new hybrid models utilize a different approach. The Forester Hybrid and Crosstrek Hybrid employ a unique series-parallel hybrid configuration that pairs Subaru’s renowned Boxer engine—a horizontally opposed 2.5-liter four-cylinder—with dual electric motors. This design aims to improve efficiency and driving dynamics, with Subaru leveraging its well-known symmetrical all-wheel-drive system for enhanced stability and traction.
While the Mazda system benefits from Toyota’s proven hybrid technology, offering more horsepower and superior fuel economy, Subaru’s approach emphasizes ruggedness and off-road capability. The Mazda’s combined 219 horsepower surpasses the Subaru’s 194 horsepower, and its EPA-estimated 38 MPG combined rating outperforms Subaru’s 35 MPG, making it a more efficient choice for daily commuting and long-distance driving.
Additionally, Subaru’s models maintain a larger fuel tank (16.6 gallons) compared to Mazda’s (14.5 gallons), providing a longer driving range despite slightly lower fuel efficiency. Both manufacturers incorporate AWD systems—electric in Mazda’s case and mechanical in Subaru’s—to ensure optimal grip on diverse terrains.
Dimensions and Capacity: A Closer Look at Practicality and Versatility
For those prioritizing interior space, cargo capacity, and off-road readiness, the Subaru Crosstrek and Forester hybrids offer compelling advantages. The Crosstrek Hybrid is comparable in passenger space to the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid, providing ample room and a cargo hold of 27.5 cubic feet, with a maximum capacity of 54.7 cubic feet when rear seats are folded.
The Forester Hybrid, being larger, surpasses both in interior volume, accommodating approximately 110 cubic feet for passengers and up to 69.1 cubic feet of cargo space with rear seats folded, making it an excellent choice for outdoor enthusiasts and families needing more utility.
In terms of ground clearance, Subaru’s hybrids stand out with 8.7 inches, offering better capabilities on rough terrains, whereas the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid’s 8.1 inches still provide respectable off-road performance.
Comparison of Key Specifications: Mazda CX-50 Hybrid versus Subaru Hybrids
| 2025 Mazda CX-50 Hybrid | 2025 Subaru Forester Hybrid | 2026 Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid | |
| Engine | 2.5L I-4 Hybrid | 2.5L H-4 Hybrid | 2.5L H-4 Hybrid |
| Transmission | eCVT | eCVT | eCVT |
| Drivetrain | e-AWD | Symmetrical AWD | Symmetrical AWD |
| Horsepower | 219 | 194 | 194 |
| Estimated MPG (Combined) | 38 | 35 | ~35 |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 14.5 gallons | 16.6 gallons | 16.6 gallons |
| Length | 186.1 inches | 183.3 inches | 176.4 inches |
| Width | 72.9 inches | 72 inches | 70.9 inches |
| Wheelbase | 110.8 inches | 105.1 inches | 105.1 inches |
| Ground Clearance | 7.8 – 8.1 inches | 8.7 inches | 8.7 inches |
| Passenger Volume | 97 cu ft | 106.6 cu ft | 100.5 cu ft |
| Cargo Space | 29.2 cu ft | 27.5 cu ft | 18.6 cu ft |
| Max Cargo Capacity | 56.3 cu ft | 69.1 cu ft | 54.7 cu ft |
Interior and Exterior Design: Style Meets Functionality
The Mazda CX-50 Hybrid is often regarded as the more upscale and visually striking option among these models, emphasizing sleek, modern styling with a sophisticated design language. Mazda’s KODO “soul in motion” design philosophy prioritizes aesthetic appeal, giving the CX-50 Hybrid a more premium appearance both inside and out.
In contrast, Subaru’s Forester Hybrid and Crosstrek Hybrid lean toward a more utilitarian, rugged aesthetic, focusing on functionality, durability, and off-road capability. The exterior design emphasizes practicality, with larger windows for improved visibility and a more straightforward, robust appearance.
Inside, Mazda’s cabin features an expansive digital dashboard with a wide display integrated into the center console, operated primarily via the Mazda Connect control knob and buttons placed conveniently behind the gear shifter. Touchscreen functionality is also available for seamless connectivity with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, catering to tech-savvy drivers.
Meanwhile, Subaru’s interior design incorporates a vertically oriented digital display that doubles as a central control interface. The Subaru system relies more heavily on touchscreen controls, which some drivers find less intuitive than Mazda’s tactile knobs and buttons. The Subaru interiors emphasize practicality, with ample space and straightforward controls suitable for outdoor adventures and family use.
Which Compact Hybrid SUV Best Fits Your Lifestyle?
Choosing between these rugged, versatile hybrid SUVs depends largely on your priorities. Subaru’s Crosstrek and Forester hybrids are popular among outdoor enthusiasts and those who require superior ground clearance and cargo capacity. Their larger size and off-road features make them ideal for adventures off the beaten path.
On the other hand, Mazda’s CX-50 Hybrid offers a compelling mix of power, efficiency, and refined styling, making it an attractive choice for drivers seeking a more upscale experience with excellent driving dynamics. Its superior fuel economy, higher horsepower, and upscale interior design appeal to those who value comfort and style in addition to utility.
Historically, Subaru’s hybrid models have outsold Mazda’s gas models in the U.S., indicating a strong market preference for their rugged, adventure-ready design. Nonetheless, the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid’s performance metrics and premium interior make it a formidable competitor, especially for drivers who prioritize efficiency and aesthetics. Ultimately, each offers a unique blend of rugged capability, efficiency, and style—your choice will depend on your specific needs and preferences.
Join Our Newsletter
Stay updated with the latest Mazda news, offers, and insights by subscribing to our email list. Never miss out on an opportunity to enhance your driving experience with Mazda’s innovative vehicles.